CFP: Edited Collection, ‘Literatures of Madness: Disability Studies and Mental Health’

Deadline: 15th January 2017

We are seeking essay proposals for a peer-reviewed edited volume, Literatures of Madness: Disability Studies and Mental Health, which will be submitted to the Literary Disability Studies book series at Palgrave Macmillan (http://www.palgrave.com/us/series/14821). The volume will collect disability studies essays that focus on mental health, madness, and addiction in literary texts. Papers that engage with the place of psychiatric disability within the larger field of disability studies are especially welcome. Topics may include, but are certainly not limited, to the following:

  • Intersections of addiction/psychiatric disability and race, class, gender, and queer identity in literature
  • Autobiography, authority, and mental illness
  • Disability and madness post-Foucault
  • Neurodiversity and psychiatric disability
  • Feminist and queer disability studies of psychiatric disability and addiction in literature
  • Cross-cultural perspectives on mental illness and disability
  • Madness studies in literature
  • C/S/X (consumer/survivor/ex) patient narratives and disability studies

Please submit abstracts of 250-500 words, plus a short biography, to Elizabeth J. Donaldson edonalds@nyit.edu, by 15th January 2017. Queries about the CFP before this deadline are very welcome. Accepted authors will be notified by 1 February 2017, and first drafts of chapters (approximately 6000 words) will be due on 15 June 2017 for peer review.

Conference Registration: ‘Other Psychotherapies – across time, space, and cultures’, Glasgow

Other Psychotherapies – across time, space, and cultures

Date: Monday 3rd – Tuesday 4th April 2017

Location: Wolfson Medical Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8LQ

Organizing Committee:

  • Dr Gavin Miller (Chair), Medical Humanities Research Centre/English Literature, University of Glasgow
  • Dr Sofia Xenofontos, Classics, University of Glasgow
  • Dr Cheryl McGeachan, Geographical and Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow
  • Dr Ross White, Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool

Keynote Speakers:

  • Dr Claudia Lang, Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich: ‘Theory and practice in Ayurvedic psychotherapy’
  • Dr Chiara Thumiger, Classics and Ancient History, University of Warwick: ‘Therapies of the word in ancient medicine’
  • Dr Elizabeth Roxburgh, Psychology, University of Northampton: ‘Anomalous experiences and mental health’
  • Dr Jennifer Lea, Geography, University of Exeter: ‘Building “A Mindful Nation”? The use of mindfulness meditation in educational, health and criminal justice settings’

The Wellcome Trust-funded conference ‘Other Psychotherapies – across time, space, and cultures’ brings contemporary Western expertise into dialogue with psychotherapeutic approaches from ‘other’ spatially, historically or otherwise ‘distant’ cultures. Having confirmed the programme of speakers for the event, we are delighted to announce that general registration is now open.

Registration:

Registration costs £40 for general admittance, and £15 for students/service users. Ticket price includes attendance at the conference on 3rd-4th April 2017, including lunch and refreshments on both days, and a buffet dinner on Mon 3rd April.

To register, and to see our full programme of speakers, please visit our Eventbrite page.

Please email the organisers at arts-otherpsychs@glasgow.ac.uk if you have any queries.

CFP: Disability and Disciplines: The International Conference on Educational, Cultural, and Disability Studies, Liverpool Hope

Disability and Disciplines: The International Conference on Educational, Cultural, and Disability Studies

Date: 5th-6th July 2017

Location: Centre for Culture and Disability Studies, Liverpool Hope University

Keynote Speakers:

  • Prof. Robert McRuer, George Washington University
  • Prof. Katherine Runswick-Cole, Manchester Metropolitan University

Interdisciplinarity is pivotal in the development of the academy for many reasons, some of which form the conceptual framework of the Centre for Culture and Disability Studies. Although far from straightforward in practice, the thinking is that interdisciplinarity leads to curricular reform that itself leads to changes in social attitudes – or more specifically, that appreciation of disability studies within the various academic disciplines ultimately contributes to the erosion of ableism and disablism in culture and society.

The organisers of the 4th biennial CCDS conference welcome proposals from professors, lecturers, students, and other interested parties for papers that explore the benefits of interdisciplinarity between Disability Studies and subjects such as Aesthetics, Art, Business Studies, Creative Writing, Cultural Studies, Education Studies, Film Studies, History, Holocaust Studies, International Studies, Literary Studies, Literacy Studies, Management Studies, Media Studies, Medical Humanities, Museum Studies, Philosophy, Professional Studies, Special Educational Needs, Technology, and Women’s Studies. This list is meant to be suggestive rather than exhaustive.

Paper proposals of 150-200 words should be sent to disciplines@hope.ac.uk on or before 1st February 2017.

Paper presentations are allocated 20 minute slots and poster presentations, as well as themed panels of 3 papers are also encouraged.

Booking information will be circulated in the coming weeks.

Like Disability and Disciplines on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/DisciplinesConference

The CCDS conference in 2013 resulted in Disability, Avoidance, and the Academy: http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9781138858664/

Videos from the CCDS conference in 2015 are available: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmNcCKNIFGdTu5JjHbzf9DQ

CFP: Reading Bodies, Writing Minds, Nottingham

Date: 13th April 2017

Location: Highfield House, University of Nottingham, University Park Campus

Reading Bodies, Writing Minds is a one-day conference to be held at the University of Nottingham on 13 April 2017. The conference will investigate representations from the arts and social sciences of suffering, seeing, and treating mental illness. This interdisciplinary event is intended to foster communication between different study areas and subjects and to that end we invite abstracts addressing historical and modern entanglements of medicine and the humanities. The conference’s two keynote speakers are Dr. Mary Ann Lund of the University of Leicester, specialising in Elizabethan-era melancholy, and Dr. Chantelle Saville of the University of Auckland, speaking on medieval theory of emotion.

For colleagues who wish to be considered to present a paper (not in excess of 20 minutes in length), please submit by 1st February 2017 an abstract of no more than 250 words outlining the paper and the area of research.

Submissions might include, but are not restricted to, the following topics:

  • Historical perspectives on mood and emotion.
  • Metaphors and artistic forms commonly or historically associated with mental health.
  • Modern treatments or analogues of historical artistic approaches to mental health.
  • How medical texts and texts about mental health and illness represent and construct their ideal reader.

All accepted papers will be considered for peer-review and potential publication in an edited volume of conference proceedings. This event is supported by funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the Midlands 3 Cities organisation.

Abstracts should be sent to: MedicalHumanities2017@gmail.com.

For general enquiries: please email the above address and address to Martin Brooks.

MHRC Discussion Group: ‘Discovering Medical Humanities Collections’, Special Collections at University of Glasgow Library

Discovering Medical Humanities Collections, staff from Archives and Special Collections, University of Glasgow

Date: 1-2pm, Wednesday 16th November

Venue: Special Collections, Level 12 of the University of Glasgow Library

Please join Archives and Special Collection staff to discuss the discovery of Medical Humanities collections. Questions raised include; How effectively are we promoting the University’s medical humanities collections? How easy are they to discover? Archives & Special Collections staff are keen to hear your thoughts as we review and revise online information about the University’s unique and distinctive research resources.

If you would like to look over any of the current online resources before the session please see:

CFP: Special Issue of Feminist Formations, ‘Queer/Crip Contagions’

CFP: Special Issue of Feminist Formations, ‘Queer/Crip Contagions’
Edited by Kelly Fritsch and Anne McGuire
Full Papers due 1st February 2017

This special issue charts the limits and possibilities of queer/crip biosocial politics by examining the ways these intersect and co-mingle with the narratives, practices, and temporalities of contagion. Feminist scholars have long theorized “queer” and “crip” as unsettling, strange, twisted, or disruptive. Moreover, feminists have demonstrated how a queer/crip refusal of closure invites a range of discursive and embodied forms of contestation and coalition, offering radical alternatives to assimilationist or reformist politics. The coming together of queer and crip is an unstable yet fruitful site of interdisciplinary and multispecies exposure and exchange. Building upon and extending these insights, this special issue will trace the multiple and unexpected ways “queer” and “crip” influence and infect one another. Drawing on the etymology of contagion as “a touching, contact” or “touching closely,” how do queer and crip come into contact? What is absorbed? What is exchanged? And, what is or might yet be produced at this site? We solicit a diverse collection of articles emanating from a range of interdisciplinary fields and areas of study, but that are also united by a shared commitment to queer and crip the discourses and practices of contagion itself.

Bound by neither body nor border, contagion has become an emergent area of interest among scholars working at the intersections of critical race, transnational feminisms, queer theory and disability studies. Indeed, contagion frequently incites medical and moral crisis and panic through its historical, transnational, colonial, and imperial links to racial, sexual, and ability formations and violence. Jasbir Puar argues that the lexicon of contagion and disease “suture” together “etymological and political links” connecting racist/orientalist fears of border penetration and infiltration with cultural anxieties around queer, sick and/or disabled bodies (2007, 52). Mel Chen describes a queer/crip contagion that “de-territorializes,” exhibiting a unique flexibility to move “through and against imperialistic spatializations of ‘here’ and ‘there’” (2012, 167). Neel Ahuja marks contagion through projects of public health intervention and US empire that embed national defense and imperial interests in the racialized, gendered, sexualized, and ableist materializations of bodies (2016, xvi). Scholarship on the ongoing histories and logics of eugenics demonstrates how cultural ideologies of disability-as-threat contaminate and co-mingle with sexually and racially-coded narratives of biological in/security, thus legitimizing a range of neo/colonial and imperial health and hygiene practices in the name of individual, social, and economic development. By tracking contagion through contemporary discourses on viral diseases (i.e., Zika, HIV/AIDS, SARS, West Nile, Avian Flu, H1N1, or the range of diseases and illnesses associated with bioterrorism and biosecurity) and through the “epidemicization” of such phenomena as obesity, autism, smoking, poverty, violent crime, or toxic lead poisoning, we can develop a better sense of the cross-contamination between categories of race, gender, sexuality, and disability. Moreover, we can better understand how these categories have become essential to the organization of modern conceptualizations of human worth/value and to the authorization of an array of paternalistic, clinical, and imperial and colonial interventions.

Contagion most often comes to be associated with danger and undesirability – a racialized, pathological threat to be neutralized, eliminated, or cured. As contagion replicates and spreads through the expanding folds and ever-widening spectrums of illness, threats to our health and to our communities remain elusive and transitory, always eclipsed, always on the future horizon. Yet, contagion moves in indeterminate ways. Working to reorganize and manage both spatial/temporal relations, contagion de-regulates categories of health and disorder, while also and at the same time, anticipates the increased regulation and surveillance of bodies, minds and movements; contagion stimulates temporalities of speed, urgency and emergency, while also producing moments of stillness and suspended animation. Traveling along non-linear, transnational circuits spanning “then” and “now,” “here” and “there,” the queer/crip site of contagion provides a unique vantage for interrogating the violence of global capitalism, imperialism, colonialism, and its biosocial economies of human/nonhuman worth and precarity. Unbounded, intimate, and indeterminate, contagion also provides the grounds for provocative encounters and exchange: novel alliances between patients, scientists, politicians, doctors, biotech companies, community groups, and many others, that give rise to new kinds of biosocial relations. Contagion suggests a site of exposure, a vector of change, or a transgressive mixing that does not stay still. Theories of queer/crip contagion ask: which forms of embodiment are incorporated into life and which are put into quarantine or driven out of this vital fold? (Ahuja 2016; Puar 2012; McRuer 2010).

This special issue asks: how are queer/crip contagions – conceived of as unbounded convergences of bodies, minds, and meanings – working to open up new sites of, and for, social and political exchange? How are crip/queer contagions replicating, and spreading in ways that avoid the pitfalls of what Priscilla Wald (2008) has referred to as “outbreak narratives”? In other words, how are queer/crip narratives refusing social, political, medical, and moral containment by pushing back against 21st century tools and techniques aimed at controlling, capturing, arresting, or otherwise limiting the possibilities of and for biosocial politics: risk management, for example, neoliberal demands for flexibility, homo/able nationalism, clinical and state interventions and occupations, racialized violence, and/or ongoing colonial or imperial development projects?

This issue will build upon, enliven, and complicate emergent scholarship at the nexus of queer and crip. The editors encourage the submission of transnational feminist and intersectional work that engages queer/crip in relation to ethnicity, race, gender, disability, sexuality, age, citizenship, class and other socially produced categories of difference.

We welcome submissions related to, but not limited to the following questions: 

  • How are crip and queer theory shaped by the discourses and practices of contagion? What new kinds of epistemological and political frameworks emerge out of cross-contaminations between “queer” and “crip”?
  • What social and political meanings underpin the issue’s key terms ‘queer’, ‘crip’ and ‘contagion’? How are these categories produced by and responsive to ongoing histories of racism/ableism/heteronormativity/sexism?
  • How are transnational feminist perspectives penetrating queer/crip knowledge production? What new kinds of knowledge might yet be produced by attending to transnational issues and perspectives?
  • How do the lived experiences of queerness, disability, and chronic illness change across boundaries of race, ethnicity, class, and gender?
  • How do queer and crip challenge and reconfigure received understandings of kinship relations and imaginaries?
  • What are the limits and possibilities of thinking crip/queer as fluid, graded spectrums anchored by such binaries as homo/hetero, sickness/health, normal/abnormal?
  • How do changing forms of securitization impact queer/crip contagions? How do the discourses of contagion figure crip/queer bodies as threats to national security?
  • How does contagion influence disabled/queer/trans/race mobility across borders? What is the relationship between discourses of contagion and state or national practices of containment such as arrest/detention/delay?
  • How do increases in biometrics, biosecurity, and bioterrorism impact queer/crip contestations and coalitions?
  • What is the temporality of the contagion? How does contagion mediate our movements? Impact chronicity?
  • How are epidemics produced? What does and does not get framed as an epidemic? As non-contagious social “problems” like autism and obesity get narrated in terms of spreading epidemics, what work is and is not accomplished via contagion as metaphor?
  • What does social and moral panic over widespread/spreading diseases, disabilities and illnesses caused by viruses (e.g., Zika) or contaminants (e.g., lead, mercury, exposure to plasticizers, dirty water) reveal about cultural understandings of disability? How might a queer/crip reading of such events enrich/complicate our understandings of social advocacy (e.g., environmental activism, racial justice or reproductive rights)?
  • What is the relation between queer/crip contagions and immunization?
  • What might a queer/crip critique of epidemic/pandemic preparedness (e.g., evacuation plans, triage policies, etc.) look like?
  • How might a queer/crip framework of contagion critique or engage the exportation of health/hygiene techniques from the global north to global south? How would a queer/crip analysis of contagion both complicate and enrich analyses of global healthcare imbalances and political debates about unequal access to treatments/immunizations/cures in the Global South?
  • How do queer/crip contagions contest or mark the failure of imperialist, colonialist, and/or capitalist practices of biosecurity, biometrics, or governance?
  • As we track and follow the patterns/trajectory of contagions, where will it take us? What new forms of inter/transdisciplinary alliances might open up?

And/or that engage the following key topics:Virality; Immunity; Epidemics; Public health; Crip/queer time, temporalities, futures, futurities; Chronicity, chronic conditions; Capitalism, neoliberalism, austerity, precarity; Bioeconomies, biocapitalism, economization or financialization of life; Toxicity; Hybridity; Trans-ability; Intra-species relations; Health, hygiene, healthism;  Nature/Culture;  Disability, illness, impairment, madness, Deafness, neurodiverity; Making kin;  Ecologies, environments; Affect; Cripistemologies; Trauma, memory;  Nation, colonialism, imperialism; Biosecurity and racialization/pathologization; Bioterrorism

Guest Editors:

  • Kelly Fritsch, Banting Postdoctoral Fellow, Women & Gender Studies Institute and Technoscience Research Unit, University of Toronto kelly.fritsch@utoronto.ca
  • Anne McGuire, Assistant Professor, Equity Studies Program, University of Toronto anne.mcguire@utoronto.ca

Submission Process: Full papers (between 8,000- 11,000 words including references) should be sent by 1st February 2017 to Kelly Fritsch (kelly.fritsch@utoronto.ca)   and Anne McGuire (anne.mcguire@utoronto.ca). Please include “Queer/Crip Contagions Submission” in the subject line of your submission.

Author(s) should include three files as attachments:

1. Cover page with identifying information including name, title, institutional affiliation, address, phone numbers, and email;
2. Abstract and keywords;
3. Complete manuscript, with all identifying information removed. Files must be in Word (.doc) or Rich Text Format (.rtf).

All submissions must follow the Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) author-date system with parenthetical citations. All text, including quotations, must be double-spaced.Following the deadline, guest editors will review the manuscripts and determine those to be sent for full anonymous review.

Feminist Formations style guide is available at: https://feministformations.org/sites/default/files/FeministFormationsStyleGuide2.pdf.

Please contact either of the co-editors with questions or concerns about the submission process.

Funding: Special Collections Centre Visiting Scholars Awards, University of Aberdeen

Funded by the Friends of Aberdeen University Library and the Special Collections Centre

Deadline for applications: 1 February 2017

Applications are invited for the 2017 Special Collections Centre Visiting Scholar Awards at the Sir Duncan Rice Library, University of Aberdeen. These awards are available to academic researchers wishing to travel to Aberdeen to make use of materials held in the Special Collections Centre. They provide financial support towards the costs of travel and accommodation, up to £2,000 to cover expenses incurred over a period of two to four weeks, while pursuing a research project directly relating to the University’s collections. The Special Collections Centre is home to the University’s historic collections of books, manuscripts, archives and photographs. The holdings comprise over 230,000 rare printed books and 5,000 archival collections, with material dating to the 3rd century BC. For information about our holdings and facilities visit: www.abdn.ac.uk/special-collections

Visiting scholars will be granted access to library facilities at the Sir Duncan Rice Library, including access to the Wolfson Reading Room in the Special Collections Centre.

Eligibility: The award will be granted to scholars for a project relating to materials held in the Special Collections Centre. Applicants will be in possession of a PhD but the award is open to researchers at any stage of their academic career. Independent and emeritus scholars may also apply. University of Aberdeen staff may apply on behalf of a visiting scholar, in which case the scholar is to be invited to share research findings through a seminar, lecture or workshop.

Duration: two to four week period of study to be undertaken any time between 1 April and 22 December 2017. Residence: Scholars should normally be resident in the Aberdeen area for the duration of the award.

Expenses: Funds may be claimed against travel, subsistence and other reasonable research expenses. Scholars will make their own arrangements for travel and accommodation and will be expected to submit receipts in order to claim expenses up to the value of £2,000.

Schedule: Applications will be peer-reviewed under the supervision of the International Advisory Board of the Aberdeen Humanities Fund. Awards will made by a selection committee composed of Library staff, members of the Humanities Fund Board and representatives of the Friends of Aberdeen University Library. Applicants will be notified of decisions by 1 March 2017.

Outputs: This award should be acknowledged in any future publications arising from the research undertaken during the time of the award. Visiting scholars will also be expected to provide a short report of their research findings which will be made publicly available on our webpages.

To apply, please submit a project outline of 500-1,000 words, explaining the scope of the project and the relevance of the University of Aberdeen’s library collections to this research, along with a two-page CV. Enquiries and applications should be submitted to: sccvisitingscholars@abdn.ac.uk.

Deadline for applications: 1 February 2017.

CFP: ‘VariAbilities III: The Same Only Different?’, London, 6-7 June 2017

VariAbilities III: The Same Only Different?

Location: Senate House, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E

Date: Tuesday 6th – Wednesday 7th June 2017

In the third iteration of the Variabilities Series, we will take stock of the academic work done on the “body” in “history”.

When we study the “Body” should we restrict ourselves to impaired bodies or make comparisons with sports bodies? Or should a conference discussing the body entertain papers on both impaired and sports bodies?

When we consider “history” we must ask ourselves when did history begin, and has it ended? Variabilities III is casting its nets as widely as possible, with no methodological assumptions, beginning or end dates, with as wide scope for dialogue as possible.

Come and tell us what the “body” in “history” means to you.

For accessibility purposes we welcome Skype Presentations.

Please send your proposal (300 words) by November 30th 2016 to:

chris.mounsey@winchester.ac.uk and stan.booth@winchester.ac.uk

 

Research Funding: ‘Impact of First World War on Medicine and Healthcare’, Worcester Medical Museums

Research Bursary: Impact of First World War on Medicine and Healthcare

Researcher to be appointed in October 2016. Project to be complete by September 2017.
This is a paid research opportunity.

Project Details

Worcester’s Medical Museums are looking for a Researcher to study the impact of the First World War on developments in medicine and healthcare in Worcestershire (and beyond). This will include the areas and disciplines of medicine covered in displays at both museums, to include (but not limited to): Home Medicine, Medical Science, Surgery, Anaesthetics, War surgery, and First Aid. The Researcher will have access to Worcester Medical Museums’ collection of objects, books and photographs, and archives held at The Hive. The Researcher will theme and edit their findings for printing in a mini publication, and for display on a pop-up banner to be toured. To view our previous research publication about the story of the first female Resident Medical Officer at Worcester Infirmary, go to http://medicalmuseum.org.uk/research-2.

This project is funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund, and part of the larger Worcestershire World War 100 partnership with heritage organisations and attractions in Worcestershire. The found research will enable us to share the broader picture of developments in medicine and healthcare during this time, and enable visitors to comment on the subject matter through social media, display panels at the George Marshall Medical Museum and The Infirmary, and the ‘Debating Space’ at The Infirmary. We will also publish the findings in a mini booklet available both online and in print.

Supervision

The Researcher will have regular supervision sessions with Dr. Frank Crompton, Associate Fellow at the University of Birmingham Centre for the History of Medicine, and longstanding PhD supervisor for the University of Worcester.

To Apply

To apply for this role please send a current CV and sample of your writing no longer than 2 sides A4 from a completed research document (e.g. dissertation, essay, published article) to Mark Macleod, Head of The Infirmary at m.macleod@worc.ac.uk or The Infirmary, University of Worcester, Castle Street, Worcester, WR1 3AS by 12pm on Friday 21st October, 2016 with appointment before the end of October.

CFP: Special Issue of RHM, ‘Disability and Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights’

Special Issue: ‘Disability and Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights’, Reproductive Health Matters

Deadline: 30th Nov 2016

The forthcoming issue of RHM, which is produced in partnership with CREA, and co-edited with Janet Price and Renu Addlaka, is aimed at shedding light on the population of people with disabilities, focusing on their sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). This is a subject that is slowly emerging from a private world of neglect and exclusion into public discourse and policy.

More than 15% of the world’s population are affected by disability, which include physical or sensory impairments, intellectual disability, as well as psychosocial disability. While persons with disability have equal rights and sexual and reproductive desires and hopes as non-disabled people, society has disregarded their sexuality and reproductive concerns, aspirations and human rights. The topic of SRHR has also been largely overlooked by the disability rights movement and neglected in policy, planning and service delivery by social, health and welfare services.

Within this thematic issue, we intend to provide an arena for original research, personal experiences and critical analyses that address the current situation and future potential in sexuality and SRHR of people with disabilities. The issue will concentrate on three areas:

1. Rights, justice and aspirations of people with disabilities

Sexual and reproductive health and rights of people with disabilities continue to be contested, and there are particular concerns in relation to women with disabilities. Analysis of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) negotiations demonstrates how rights were downgraded to focus on family life, resulting in no mentions of sexuality, sexual integrity or agency, or non-heteropatriarchal approaches and identities. However, debates and campaigns are emerging, recognising people with disabilities as sexual beings with equal rights to aspirations for sexual desire, intimacy, love, relationships and sexual and reproductive choices. Activism has resulted in positive movement at regional level, although in negotiating the Sustainable Development Goals, it achieved limited impact. There is a need for analysis of the success and failures of activism in relation to policy creation and its implementation. Societies are moving at different rates in recognising SRHR of people with disabilities. As people with disabilities gain increasing agency and control in other areas of their lives, it is essential to understand the context and outcomes of demands for choice over sexuality and relationships and how these emerge in relation to diversity and equality in the struggle for personal freedoms and a better quality of life.

2. Inequitable structures and access

Access is a complex process, dependent on multiple factors and hampered by poverty, stigma and discrimination, inaccessible environments and communications, and absence of meaningful engagement of people with disabilities in decision making and service delivery. Neoliberalism and austerity measures also impact access to personal and institutional SRHR resources, a careful examination of which is highly warranted. War, ongoing conflict and environmental disasters further cause instability, and result in an increase in the numbers of people with disabilities. For women, disability often means being suddenly displaced, excluded from a life of femininity, partnership, active sexuality and often denied the opportunities for motherhood. In the context of refugees and displaced populations, people with complex impairments may be left behind without support. In this context, vulnerability increases the levels of sexual violence towards both women and men, resulting in sexual and reproductive trauma —an unacknowledged form of disability —that cause stigma and isolation. These are crucial, yet rarely debated challenges in the respect, protection and fulfilment of SRHR.

3. Personal experiences, identity and intersectionality

Prejudice around disability and sexuality have resulted in poor documentation of local and cultural factors that shape personal shame and construct challenges in developing sexual confidence and establishing relationships. There is limited research on how cultural attitudes affect people with disabilities in search of sexual relationships, desire to express sexual orientation and gender identity, the negotiation of which is almost always counter to collective norms of heterosexuality, marriage and family.

While sexual violence towards people with disabilities is moderately well documented and human rights violations in this regard are well recognised, crucial analysis of personal context and gender dynamics, including the dynamic between disability and feminist activism, are limited. There is little data about interactions and alliances across movements around disability and sexuality rights despite the emergence of coalitions, courses and research developed transversally in various regions, initiatives that have a growing global reach.

Call for Papers – What and When?

For this issue of Reproductive Health Matters, we are inviting articles that contribute towards building a knowledge base that can inform policy and practice and offer a better understanding of the connection and intersection of SRHR and disability. We welcome analytical pieces, critical perspectives and contextual analysis on SRHR of people with disabilities, addressing the broad outlines given here. We encourage original research articles, and policy and human rights analysis and we will consider reviews, commentaries, viewpoints and critical perspectives. Submission of photo or video articles illustrating positive dimensions of the topic is encouraged. We warmly welcome narratives from people with disabilities, as well as contributions from low- and middle income countries and from activists and actors promoting SRHR for people with disabilities.

Across these areas, we welcome analytic approaches to discursive strategies of change related to the subject. Apart from that already outlined, other potential topics include:

  • What are people with disabilities’ experiences of: pleasure and managing violence; establishing relationships and fulfilling their SRHR; challenging prejudice; and negotiating the influence of intersectional factors, e.g., shared disability, gender, ethnicity, and educational status?
  • Between who and where are relationships established by people with disabilities, how are these experienced, and how do they vary socio-culturally and from the human rights perspective?
  • What are the responses to the desire for comprehensive sexuality information, sexuality education and services, including sexual assistance for people with disabilities?
  • How is the exclusionary power of shame exacerbated and accompanied by violence in times of crisis and shifting socio-economic power, e.g., elections, coups, war, economic crisis?
Submissions accepted between 1 October and 30 November 2016

Submit at http://ees.elsevier.com/rhm

**Please carefully read submission guidelines before submissions.